Will Organizations Start Listening to their Risk Managers?
Last week we asked the LinkedIn community, “Will organizations start listening to their risk managers?“. The response that the question has received has been extremely insightful – despite the respondents’ discouraging predictions.
The question in full highlighted the fact that many organizations were forewarned about the financial crisis and that the choice was made to continue to focus on marketing and sales rather than risk management. We asked in light of this, will organizations start listening to their risk managers, or will it be business as usual once the crisis is over?

Overall, the LinkedIn members that responded felt that business would resume as usual without any significant change to how risk management is viewed and addressed. Many respondents pointed out that any change would be dependent on the individual organization, and that the onus would rest with management to prioritize risk mitigation and to make it a part of the organization’s culture.
Many feel that risk management is still being seen as an expense rather than an important operational cost or as an investment. It seems that the perceived gap between risk management and corporate growth is ever-existent. We may see an increase in the important places on risk management in theory, but we probably won’t see it addressed the way that it should be.
Some individuals active in the discussion felt that any change that we would see in how risk management is addressed would come only in organizations that have been forced to engage in reactive risk management in the past. It is expected that then, those companies will choose to invest in proactive risk management activities to prevent future loss.
The additional findings are summarized below:
- Profit will continue to be favoured over caution despite the costs associated with poor risk management.
- Change will come if the risk management solutions are simple. If they are complex or costly, it will continue to be overlooked.
- There will be change only if all organizations change and treat risk management as an integral and vital part of their operations.
We want to see organizations investing in proactive risk management measures and making risk management a part of their organizational culture. But if a major economic breakdown isn’t going to encourage more stringent risk management efforts and the dedication of resources to put risk planning in place, we wonder, what will it take?
We would like to thank the LinkedIn members that provided their opinions on this matter. To become part of the discussion, please feel free to leave your comments below, or provide your views on LinkedIn via the original post.
(Images from StillSearc on Stock.Xchng)
You may also find the following posts interesting:
- Where were the risk managers?
- LinkedIn responds to ‘Why should all the benefits of risk management go to big companies?’
- ClearRisk Social Media Giveaway: Winner Announcement!
- Exploring Enterprise Risk Management and Organizational Culture: Part One
- Insurance is a Commodity! …Or is it?
6 Responses to “Will Organizations Start Listening to their Risk Managers?”
Leave a Reply













Kelly Strickland on July 24th, 2009
I think that organizations that survive the recession will be those that have successfully mitigated risk.
Therefor I think that yes, future companies will listen to their risk managers but only because they are the companies that always have listened.
This may not be true for emerging companies and will not account for changes on boards.
Supriya on July 24th, 2009
Thought I’d share this little article / blog started on e-financial careers –
http://news.efinancialcareers.com.au/debate_item/newsItemId-20289
I think Craig – you make a superb point on organisations needing to have a “PROACTIVE” attitude and not “REACTIVE” as can be seen in the little blog I’ve posted.
Westpac is currently recruiting Risk Managers and I’ve been told they are seeking out senior analysts and managers in their group risk area. All is fair I guess in the name of management of risks identified, so long as organisations are seen to be mitigating them- it is what disables the whistle blower from reporting significant breaches, if identified as significant.
We can always pass the blame, however what it really comes down to is ownership.
Supriya on July 24th, 2009
and commitment.
John Downey on July 26th, 2009
I think one of the main reasons that Risk Management isn’t given the attention it deserves is that there is no instant gratification or payoff, and what benefit you do get is very hard to quantify without having some serious record keeping and analytics on trends (something that typically only larger companies implement).
Nevertheless, it’s only common sense that being proactive rather than reactive is a major success factor and competitive advantage not only for companies but for individuals. Unfortunately, reports and figures win out over common sense much too often in the corporate world.
Craig Rowe on July 27th, 2009
Thank you Kelly, Supriya and John for your comments.
Kelly, I think you’re right. Organizations will need to make a change – but the change will be forced upon them. It really is too bad that they aren’t likely to engage in risk management proactively.